<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: East Meets West 265 – #OccupyRestroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tommerritt.com/2011/10/12/east-meets-west-265-%e2%80%93-occupyrestroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tommerritt.com/2011/10/12/east-meets-west-265-%e2%80%93-occupyrestroom/</link>
	<description>Curious about what Tom Merritt's up to? Well here ya go.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandler Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.tommerritt.com/2011/10/12/east-meets-west-265-%e2%80%93-occupyrestroom/comment-page-1/#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandler Bing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommerritt.com/?p=2726#comment-9129</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how to comment at the new site or what the email address for comments is.

The fact that there ARE press releases indicates the movement has already been co-opted. Originally, I believe Tom was right that it was not co-opted, but I believe he is wrong that it wouldn&#039;t be easy to co-opt the movement. It was extremely easy for the dems to co-opt the movement and most people didn&#039;t even realize it happened when the shift went from anti-wall st to anti-millionaires. 

I think there is a common ground between tea party and occupty wall st. in the anti-corporate beliefs, but they&#039;ve both been co-opted by the right and left such that it makes it hard for people in either party to support the opposing movement. The tea partiers very much support people&#039;s rights to be millionaires whereas the occupty wall streeters originally seemed to have a very diverse group of views, it has recently been co-opted to be very left and very anti-wealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how to comment at the new site or what the email address for comments is.</p>
<p>The fact that there ARE press releases indicates the movement has already been co-opted. Originally, I believe Tom was right that it was not co-opted, but I believe he is wrong that it wouldn&#8217;t be easy to co-opt the movement. It was extremely easy for the dems to co-opt the movement and most people didn&#8217;t even realize it happened when the shift went from anti-wall st to anti-millionaires. </p>
<p>I think there is a common ground between tea party and occupty wall st. in the anti-corporate beliefs, but they&#8217;ve both been co-opted by the right and left such that it makes it hard for people in either party to support the opposing movement. The tea partiers very much support people&#8217;s rights to be millionaires whereas the occupty wall streeters originally seemed to have a very diverse group of views, it has recently been co-opted to be very left and very anti-wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.275 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-09-18 02:17:00 -->
