<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET Top 5: 1980s computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tommerritt.com/2010/01/12/cnet-top-5-1980s-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tommerritt.com/2010/01/12/cnet-top-5-1980s-computers/</link>
	<description>Curious about what Tom Merritt's up to? Well here ya go.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.tommerritt.com/2010/01/12/cnet-top-5-1980s-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommerritt.com/?p=1280#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>Hi,
 I liked the 80&#039;s computer bit, but was curious when you said the Apple ][e was the last of the line. What about the Apple ][gs which I&#039;m almost certain was the last of the ][ line, and was supported in to the early 90&#039;s. I got mine in 1986 when it first launched. I believe it would have been more powerful and expandable than the other machines you mentioned. I ran my BBS on it called Haz-Mat that I still sorta run now on a Winodws host at telnet://bbs.haz-matiii.com  mostly still alive for the Fidonet feeds and games.

 Still with that said I liked the segment.
-Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
 I liked the 80&#8242;s computer bit, but was curious when you said the Apple ][e was the last of the line. What about the Apple ][gs which I'm almost certain was the last of the ][ line, and was supported in to the early 90's. I got mine in 1986 when it first launched. I believe it would have been more powerful and expandable than the other machines you mentioned. I ran my BBS on it called Haz-Mat that I still sorta run now on a Winodws host at <a href="telnet://bbs.haz-matiii.com" rel="nofollow">telnet://bbs.haz-matiii.com</a>  mostly still alive for the Fidonet feeds and games.</p>
<p> Still with that said I liked the segment.<br />
-Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.tommerritt.com/2010/01/12/cnet-top-5-1980s-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommerritt.com/?p=1280#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>Tom,
Your 1980&#039;s Computer video was so much fun!  I also started out with the TI-99/4A, then on to the Commodore 64 and then the original 1984 Macintosh.

My choice for the most sold computer back then is the Vic-20.

Thanks again for the memories!

Paul Turner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
Your 1980&#8242;s Computer video was so much fun!  I also started out with the TI-99/4A, then on to the Commodore 64 and then the original 1984 Macintosh.</p>
<p>My choice for the most sold computer back then is the Vic-20.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the memories!</p>
<p>Paul Turner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.342 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-09-18 02:19:35 -->
